Siraj Sikder
The Proletarian Party of East Bengal produced and published the original Bengali document on March 1972
The Communist Party Marxist-Leninist-Maoist Bangladesh translated the document in English and published online via www.sarbaharapath.com on 28 October 2013. The party edited the translation on 23 December 2016 with a few corrections
“Proletarian revolutionaries affiliated with various forms of revisionist factions, hold high the banner of chairman Mao of ‘It is right to rebel against the reactionaries’ and rebel against the leadership of the revisionist factions, unite with the correct political party of the Proletarian class of East Bengal, the Proletarian Party of East Bengal on the basis of Marxism-Leninism-Mao Tse-tung Thought and its concrete application in the concrete practice of East Bengal!
Clear the disunity among the proletarian revolutionaries. Build the Proletarian Party of East Bengal armed with Marxism-Leninism-Mao Tsetung Thought, well-disciplined, applying method of criticism-self-criticism, linked with people, united, strong and single-centered.”
Comrades,
Sincerely you have accepted Marxism-Leninism-Mao Tse-tung Thought for the sake of the liberation of the proletariat and people of East Bengal and world. You have been affiliated with various forms of revisionist factions by being trapped in their hoax.
The reactionary leadership of those factions misguided you and betrayed with you, proletariat and people.
As a result, Indian colony has been established in East Bengal. Social imperialism and imperialism are grabbing share in this colonial plunder; and their stooge the six mountains’ lackeys, by saying socialism, democracy, secularism and nationalism, have established the fascist rule of the six mountains. Consequently, the proletariat of the great people’s China, East Bengal and world fell in difficulties and anti-China anti-communist counter-revolutionary base and public opinion has been created.
Your sacrifice and hard work being misused in wrong path went in vain.
Let us, expose the crimes of leadership of the revisionist variants, unveil the faces of these capitalist roader reactionary authorities and rebel against them.
The Neo-Revisionist Huq-Toha-Bashir
They worked for long time in Moni Singh-Mozaffar revisionist party. That time, other than fighting against the revisionist traitors, they carried counter-revolutionary activities as their running dog. They did parliamentary politics, contested in election, carried open party activities. Toha betrayed with the Jute mills workers by openly calling them to withdraw general strike.
Led by Chairman Mao, the great debate of the world proletarian revolutionaries against the modern revisionism started. That time, works of chairman Mao arrived in East Bengal. It created the ideological preparation for rebellion against the revisionists.
General proletarian revolutionaries of the revisionist communist party and its-led various mass organizations strengthened struggle against revisionist leadership.
The student revolutionaries rebelled against the representatives of the revisionists in student organization. The Kazi-Rono-Menon clique seized the opportunity of personal contradiction and formed the Students Union “Menon group”.
At that time, Huq, Toha and Bashir were obediently following the revisionist line and were united with them. It proves that they were more backward than the student revolutionaries.
Communists are the most advanced core of proletariat who lead proletariat and revolutionary masses in class and national struggle. Huq-Toha and Co. did not lead the general student revolutionaries in anti-modern revisionism struggle, but the student revolutionaries led Huq-Toha. It proves that they didn’t have the advance character of communists.
In the meantime, the rebellion of the general revolutionaries against the modern revisionists strengthened.
Huq, Toha, Bashir seized that opportunity. In order to raise them as party authority and capture power of party, they, by following Nambudripad and Jyoti Bose, formed a Marxist party named revisionist faction and deceived the proletarian revolutionaries.
Meanwhile, Huq-Toha, under the condition that they will oppose Six Points [Six points were raised by the Awami League demanding the autonomy of East Bengal – Translator] and will not oppose the ongoing national oppression over East Bengal, held meeting with Awan the chief of central Intelligence of the Pak military fascists and made compromise. So, the warrant over them was withdrawn. Thus, in exchange of withdraw of warrant, they promised not to oppose the ongoing national oppression over East Bengal, and betrayed with the proletariat and people of East Bengal.
They divided the NAP (National Awami Party—Translator) and by their-led NAP, they openly carried petit bourgeoisie confusing political activities, even Huq-Toha openly propagated reactionary things like Islamic socialism.
In the same way, they divided the Krishak Somiti (A peasant organization—Translator) and by their-led faction, they openly continuously carried reformist political activities.
That time, they, by saying Chairman Mao’s thought as the position of Chinese national leader, disheartened cadres to study and practice that. They continued to obstruct the agenda of armed struggle with the logic that time has not matured, organization and publicity still not enough.
Other than guiding the students and other intellectuals to the correct path of ideological reconstruction through merger with peasants and workers, learning from them again, steeling in armed revolution, studying and practicing Marxism, they guided them to open meeting, procession and other reformist path and transformed them into more ripened petit bourgeoisie.
When mentioning feudalism, imperialism and monopoly capitalism as the enemy of East Bengal, they said those as one and inseparable. They further said that the main and fundamental opposition in the country is on the one hand people and the inseparable manifestation of those three forces (that means people’s contradiction with feudalism, imperialism and monopoly capitalism is principal and fundamental) on the other. To judge this inseparable entity separately is nothing but willingly or unwillingly to advocate on the side of those (three forces) and work for their interest (that means, to find out principal contradiction and determining principal enemy are to serve the enemy).
By saying that, they denied the existence of principal contradiction and the importance of determining that. It is the denial of the fundamental principle of dialectical materialism, and sheer idealism. The actual meaning of not determining the principal contradiction, principal enemy, treating and attacking all the enemies equally, is hiding and saving the main enemy, that is attacking all to save a few.
It proves that, like old and modern revisionists, in philosophy, they follow idealism and metaphysics.
Later, to pose themselves as ‘Naxalite’, they opposed their own previous positions by saying feudalism versus peasantry principal contradiction and feudalism as the principal enemy. Thus they slapped on their own face.
In NAP office, Students Union office and in open meeting they opposed Naxalite peasant rebellion of India as adventurist and activities of CIA.
They upheld Rabindranath – who was the representative of the reactionary intellectuals dependent on imperialism, feudalism and bureaucratic capitalism, whose culture is national subservience, treachery and feudalist – as revolutionary and disarmed revolutionaries ideologically. They, by not struggling against the ongoing national oppression and plunder over East Bengal by the Pak military fascists, handed over the leadership of national struggle to the hand of the bureaucratic bourgeoisie, feudalist and intellectuals of East Bengal. Consequently the imperialists got the opportunity to use the national question of East Bengal. They did not activate fundamental points like development, consolidation and Bolshevization of party through armed struggle, building armed organization as the party-led main form of organization, taking armed struggle as the main form of struggle and carrying mass organizational work to serve the armed struggle.
In personal life and relation to women, they applied the filthy style of bourgeoisie society and created ugly example in front of people about the proletarian revolutionaries.
Thus, Huq-Toha carried activities similar to that of the modern revisionism.
As a consequence of the activities of Huq-Toha, general cadres rebelled against them. By seizing that rebellion as an opportunity, the Deben-Bashar, Motin-Alauddin and Kazi-Rono traitor clique, with view to catch fish in dirty water, formed various factions and posed themselves as the party authority.
The Huq-Toha and Co. became seriously isolated and moribund.
Then, to sustain, they disguised themselves as Naxalite and saved themselves from destruction by trying to apply in East Bengal the political line prepared for India for the particular condition of India and made last effort to deceive the proletariat and masses of East Bengal and India. Thus, in philosophy, they made metaphysical and idealist error through trying to apply the political line of India to the concrete condition of East Bengal by deducting ‘Concrete analysis of concrete condition’ that is the living soul of Marxism. Its consequence is like cutting feet to adjust with shoes and fixing tetrangular wooden solid in a round hole.
They, by not taking national contradiction of East Bengal as principal contradiction, said class contradiction principal and by bypassing the stage of society, dragged future task to the present time. Thus they made Trotskyite deviation. As a result, they totally isolated themselves from the anti-national oppression struggle of the people of East Bengal.
First they denied the existence of “East Bengal Workers Movement”. Later, they spread heinous slander against it and tried to vilify it. Even they propagated branding it as the conspiracy of CIA. The same slander and rumor they spread against the leadership of the East Bengal Workers Movement.
They successfully deceived the Indian proletarian revolutionaries. By showing certificate of their support and using their fame, through depending on external cause, they wanted to cover up their evil acts and sustain.
East Bengal people’s national contradiction with the Pak military fascists intensified in such an extent that war started for its solution. The Pak military fascists took barbarian fascist step to smash the existence of Bengali nation, transform her to minority by killing millions of people and destroy education, industry and trade of East Bengal.
That time, the national contradiction of the East Bengal people versus the Pak military fascists along with their collaborators was principal contradiction, and based on the principal contradiction, the Pak military fascists and their collaborators marked themselves as the main enemy before the Bengali nation. They (Pak) became isolated from people; the solution of national contradiction the armed national liberation war started, and people, themselves, started annihilating national enemies.
The theoretical aspects raised by the East Bengal Workers Movement proved historically correct, such as, society advanced through the law of dialectical materialism, that is, stage by stage solving of the contradictions via solving the main contradictions successively, principal enemy is determined based on the principal contradiction; guerilla war can be initiated through annihilation of the principal enemy; the solution of principal contradiction determines the principal aspect of revolution through determining the role of different classes to revolution and general basis of united front.
At that time, Huq-Toha said feudalism versus peasantry contradiction principal, annihilated people as class enemy and thus their activities went against the practice of the whole people of East Bengal.
Completely opposite to the dialectical materialist mass line work, this is the left adventurist Trotskyite activities of a few individuals isolated from the practice of the majority of the people. Their treacherous politics gives rise to treacherous organizational steps. They, in the name of opposing Awami League and class enemy, colluded with the Pak military fascists, became their intelligence’s informer and became Razakar (Razakar was one of the genocidal notorious local forces of the Pak military fascists in East Bengal comprised of Islamist party cadres and goons – Translator).
They made compromise with the Pak military fascists through their (Pak) intelligence chief Awan by giving them the bond that they will oppose Six Points and will not oppose national oppression by the Pak military fascists over East Bengal. Consequently, their warrant was withdrawn and they got opportunity to work openly.
Completely, this is the manifestation of the theory of Liu Chao Chi and revisionists to sustain anyhow. They held meeting different times and kept contact with the Pakistan foreign minister Bhutto, President Yahya Khan and other military fascist officials. Even they maintained communication with Niazi, Farman Ali and their goons and sold the interest of the proletariat and people of East Bengal.
When the representatives of the bureaucratic bourgeoisie, feudalist and intellectuals of East Bengal are suffering from Jail and repression; became victim of conspiracy case, at that time, doesn’t the hobnobbing of Huq-Toha with the Pak military fascists prove that they are more degenerated than the bureaucratic bourgeoisie, feudalist and reactionary intellectuals? Will the people of East Bengal name them anything other than the lackey of Pak military fascists?
At that time, the cadres of East Bengal Workers Movement were suffering serious torture in jail, they were kept solitarily in death row condemn cells, specialists were brought from US imperialists to carry investigation about them, reward was declared for arresting leadership cadres and the arrested were allured to make them betray.
That time, Huq-Toha used to move openly, if arrested, usually they were released, they could carry and sell open publications, their houses were not burnt. Even they were given arms. Doesn’t it prove that by not being attacked by enemy, actually they were merged in the rank of enemy, i.e. they became the lackeys of enemies?
They supplied the central intelligence of the Pak military fascists such information about the central leadership of the “East Bengal Workers Movement”, its structure and personal life of some of the leadership, which they came to know from the renegade traitor Nurul Hasan.
They maintained and are still maintaining line with the Bangladesh puppet government formed in India.
People got misunderstanding about ‘Naxalite’ because of their activities and that of Motin and Co. and Kazi-Rono and Co.
To prove the East Bengal peasantry versus feudalism contradiction principal, they acted like Liu Chao Chi by consciously hiding an ending part of a quotation from Stalin.
Huq wrote, “National question is basically a peasant question.” Huq consciously hided its later part.
The full quotation from Stalin is as follows: “Very often we say that the peasant question is the essence of the national question. But this does not mean that the national question is covered by the peasant question, that the peasant question is equal in scope to the national question, that the peasant question and the national question are identical. There is no need to prove that the national question is wider and richer in its scope than the peasant question.”
Events of East Bengal proved that the peasant question, that is, the class contradiction was secondary than the national question, that is, the national contradiction of East Bengal. The whole Bengali nation has united on the basis of national contradiction. As there was no proletarian leadership, the bourgeoisie, imperialists and expansionists seized that opportunity and occupied East Bengal.
At a time when the national struggle in East Bengal became acute, isn’t leaving the national question by hiding a part of Stalin’s quotation a conscious betray with the proletariat and Bengali nation?
On the other side, the great People’s China, Chou En Lai, foreign minister Chi Feng Pi and others recognized the national question of East Bengal and called for leaving its solution to the hands of the Pakistan government and the people of East Bengal without any external intervention. They further said that the expansionists and social imperialists had seized the opportunity of the national question of East Bengal.
At present, some of them are saying that East Bengal is a colony of India while some of them are saying East Bengal a Soviet colony.
In the past, they put the logic that Pakistan is a semi-colonial semi-feudal country, so her regime cannot carry colonial exploitation over East Bengal.
India is also a semi-colonial semi-feudal country and she has established her colony in East Bengal. If their logic was correct, India could not establish colony.
Thus Huq-Toha refuted their own logics.
Huq-Toha, by not critically analyzing all the problems by dialectical and historical materialism, have done so by idealism, metaphysics and historic idealism; and, they betrayed with the people and proletariat on every question.
In 26th page of their program, Huq-Toha mentioned three weapons of revolution in the following way:
- To form a strong revolutionary party armed with Marxism-Leninism-Mao Thought; to build such a party by burying all forms of opportunism, rightist and leftist, especially modern revisionism.
- To form a working class-led revolutionary united front comprising all the anti-imperialist and anti-comprador bureaucratic capital classes.
- To form revolutionary base in rural areas because villages are the weaker places of enemies compared with cities. To encircle and seize cities based on villages. Thus winning of revolution countrywide.
Three tasks followed by the revisionist leadership of the Communist party of Indonesia is as follows:
- The flag of the national united front
- The flag of the formation of the party
- The Flag of the August 1945 revolution
Let us compare the above two “tasks” with the three tasks of Chairman Mao:
“A well-disciplined Party armed with the theory of Marxism-Leninism, using the method of self-criticism and linked with the masses of the people; an army under the leadership of such a Party; a united front of all revolutionary classes and all revolutionary groups under the leadership of such a Party – these are the three main weapons with which we have defeated the enemy”
Huq-Toha and Indonesian revisionists totally deducted the formation of armed force and armed struggle.
Thus they opposed armed struggle.
They deducted the fundamental points like formation of a party that is well-disciplined, use self-criticism and is linked with people.
The Huq clique in the document dated 18.12.71 have mentioned the following three tasks:
- A solid party armed with Marxism-Leninism-Mao Tse-tung Thought
- An armed force led by the party
- The base of resistance led by the party
Here, they deducted united front, which is one of the important weapons for the victory of revolution.
In party formation, here too, they have deducted fundamental points like the formation of a Party that is well-disciplined, apply criticism and self-criticism and is linked with the people.
They never mentioned the national contradiction of East Bengal people versus Indian expansionism. Thus, by not mentioning the possibility of attack by the Indian expansionists over East Bengal and possibility of their invasion and control in East Bengal, they kept the people of East Bengal unprepared. The “East Bengal Workers Movement” in its theses, mentioned the national contradiction of East Bengal people versus Indian expansionists as a fundamental contradiction responsible for the social development of East Bengal.
Events historically proved the analysis of East Bengal Workers Movement correct.
They ridiculed at us by saying that then, why would not the East Bengal versus Burma contradiction be a fundamental one? By saying that, they proved their inability of making real analysis of expansionism and understanding the meaning of expansionism. Initially they had not mentioned the East Bengal people’s national contradiction with the Soviet social imperialism. Though later mentioned, they haven’t said it as a fundamental one responsible for the social development of East Bengal. In order to pose themselves as revolutionary, they just called some names of social imperialism.
On the other side, from the very beginning in its theses, the East Bengal Workers Movement mentioned the national contradiction of East Bengal people versus Soviet social imperialism a fundamental contradiction responsible for the social development of East Bengal. It also proved historically correct in the course of social development of East Bengal.
Had Huq-Toha-Bashir not been able to use the fame and support of the Indian Marxist-Leninists by deceiving them, they would be buried before.
The cause of development of matter is internal. They could not gain even by using the fame of the proletarian revolutionaries of India, because in essence, they are bourgeoisie, reactionary and revisionist.
They are affected by serious internal contradiction, splintered and crisis-fallen. Huq formed a Marxist-Leninist named faction, while Toha formed another Marxist-Leninist named faction. They are charging and counter-charging each other as liar, split-ist, clique and revisionist; and they are exposing their own real nature further more clearly.
Bodruddin-Nazrul-Amol Sen of them have formed another faction named ‘Solidarity Center’.
Thus, in intense storm of class and national struggle, their face has been exposed largely. Proletarian revolutionaries are realizing their deceit. Soon, Indian proletarian revolutionaries too will be able to realize their deceit. The proletarian revolutionaries of East Bengal and India will sweep them out to dustbin.
The Motin-Alauddin Trotskyite-Guevarist
They were affiliated with the Moni Singh-Mozaffar revisionist party. By seizing the opportunity of the anti-revisionist rebellion of the general proletarian revolutionary cadres, they, together with Huq-Toha and Co. formed a neo-revisionist faction and made futile effort to deceive general cadres and masses.
In order to seize the opportunity of opposition of general cadres against the Huq-Toha neo-revisionists, they presented themselves with reactionary position. They analyzed East Bengal as a capitalist society and tried to unite party cadres and masses behind that wrong politics.
From that position, naturally it can be concluded that East Bengal completed bourgeoisie democratic revolution, in rural areas, neither there is feudalist exploitation nor secondarily does it exist, capitalism developed there and became dominant, neither imperialist exploitation, nor that of bureaucratic capital exist in the country. If capitalist exploitation is principal, the question of taking program for socialist revolution comes up.
This is to bypass the present stage of society and accomplish the future task at present. This is a Trotskyite deviation. It proves that they, in case of social development, like modern and old revisionists, have applied historic idealism in place of historic materialism.
They obstinately persisted in that wrong and reactionary Trotskyite political line, formed strong clique and faction, and by uniting with the same viewer Deben-Bashar and Co., secretly formed embryonic faction inside faction.
The Huq-Toha and Co. expelled them.
If Deben-Bashar had not given them shelter and general cadres had not rebelled because of the treachery of the Huq-Toha and Co., the Motin-Alauddin and co. would have been finished immediately.
Motin-Alauddin and Co. concentrated on Krishak Somiti and NAP etc. and carried open reformist activities. They got united with the Guevarists like Mahbubullah, AKM Fazlul Huq, Amzad.
They, without any self-criticism, by not leaving the Trotskyte position “Capitalist exploitation principal”, said East Bengal feudalism versus peasantry contradiction principal and class enemy annihilation, that is, they said the similar thing of Huq-Toha; and by being united with Deben-Bashar and co., they formed the “Communist Party of East Bengal”, established themselves as party authority and made futile attempt to pose themselves as ‘Naxalite’.
They, by not taking the national contradiction of East Bengal as the principal contradiction and by saying class contradiction principal, deducted the present political task and dragged future task by bypassing the stage of society. Thus, they made Trotskyite error.
Consequently, they handed over the national flag to the Indian expansionism, social imperialism, imperialism and the East Bengal bureaucratic bourgeoisie, feudalist and reactionary intellectuals.
They made the similar error like Huq-Toha and Co. and in philosophy, followed idealism and metaphysics in place of dialectical materialism; historical idealism in place of historical materialism.
Their treacherous political line gives rise to treacherous organizational steps.
Before and after the 25 March, they colluded with the Pak military fascists. If arrested, the Pak military fascists released them, gave them opportunity of free movement and avoided suppression over them.
Secretly, they collaborated with the Pak military fascists. In the name of class enemy annihilation, they carried dacoity in the houses of people and killed people. People treated them as dacoit, resisted them and killed some of them; and burned their houses. At last they were overthrown from that area.
After 25 March, they got divided on national question; Deben-Bashar and Motin-Alauddin expelled each other.
For their last survival, Motin-Alauddin formed a Marxist-Leninist named faction.
The real ugly faces of the Motin and Co. have largely been exposed and they have been seriously isolated. They are making futile attempt to save themselves by uniting with Huq-Toha.
They have tried to maintain faction by making relatives among party cadres through feudalist method.
They spread heinous slander and bad name against the “East Bengal Workers Movement” and its leadership, even they branded them as CIA-oriented.
By saying ‘Freedom’ of East Bengal, ‘Independent People’s Democratic East Bengal’ etc, they tried to pose themselves as anti-national oppression, pro-independence and further clarified own theoretical bankruptcy.
Both national and democratic revolution aspects exist in the term people’s democratic East Bengal. Which one among them is principal will be determined by the principal contradiction in the society. They said feudalism as the principal enemy and feudalism versus peasantry as the principal contradiction. In that case, naturally democratic revolution is principal, so, independence i.e. national revolution is secondary.
So, their demand of ‘Freedom’ and ‘Independent people’s democratic East Bengal’ were opposite to their principal contradiction and other political and military lines.
The Deben-Bashar Trotskyite-Guavarist
They were affiliated with the Moni Sing-Mozaffar revisionist communist party. Later, by seizing the rebellion of anti-revisionist general cadres, they united with Huq-Toha, Motin-Alauddin to form the neo-revisionist faction.
They were the follower of the reactionary position “Capitalist exploitation is principal in East Bengal”. They never made self-criticism for that position.
Despite recognizing the national oppression over East Bengal, they, because of theoretical bankruptcy, made compromise with opportunism, gave Motin-Alauddin a chance for unity and saved them from collapse.
They gave the chance for unity to the Mahbubullah-Amzad Guevarists too. Thus, by leaving the principle, they united with the opportunists and at last proved themselves opportunist too.
They, by not totally agreeing with Motin-Alauddin about the feudalism versus peasantry contradiction principal line and class enemy annihilation line, they existed as a faction inside faction.
It proves that the unity among them was not political and ideological; rather it was on the basis of opportunism.
It proves that they don’t have knowledge regarding the political party of the proletariat at all. At last they got divided on the national question of East Bengal and after 25 March, fled to India.
They took the shelter of Jyoti Bose and Nambudripod in India. It proves their compromising character regarding revisionism and opportunism. It further proves their inability of carrying armed struggle based on sacrifice and reliance on people.
They established unprincipled unity with the Kazi-Rono conspirators and Marxist-named some bourgeoisie factions and formed the so-called “Coordination committee of national liberation struggle”.
Proletarians never recognize the existence of faction, rather uncompromisingly struggle against that till the end. The meaning of unifying by recognizing the existence of faction is abandoning the Marxist fundamental principle regarding party. Thus, they abandoned the Marxist fundamental principle regarding party.
They proved their ignorance regarding united front by forming coordination committee. Severe fascist attack of the Pak military fascists, people’s great resistance and contribution, reaction of imperialism, social imperialism, expansionism and six mountains’ lackeys, that is, the serious storm of the time made their mind out of control and exposed their real petit bourgeoisie character.
They opposed the correct role of the great Chinese proletariat and proletarians of India and other countries.
They supported the counter-progressive counter-revolutionary war of national subservience led by the six mountains’ lackeys the running dogs of Indian expansionism, social imperialism and imperialism.
They welcomed the occupation of East Bengal by the Indian expansionists; welcomed the Indian lackey the Bangladesh puppet government and openly opposed China.
They welcomed foreign intervention on national question of East Bengal and supported the six mountains’ lackey fascists who obstructed the true proletarian-led national struggle, killed proletarian revolutionaries and betrayed with the people of East Bengal and Bengali nation. Thus, they, in East Bengal, became the stooge of the expansionists, social imperialists, imperialists and their running dog the six mountains’ lackeys; and they betrayed with proletariat of East Bengal and world.
The gave promise of taking part in parliamentary election by abandoning the armed struggle, recognized the Bangladesh puppet government, welcomed the expansionists, opposed China and made attempt to create reactionary public opinion to form an open party by following Jyoti Bose-Nambudripod.
They bowed their head so far that Deben Sikder expressed solidarity with Mujiv-ism of democracy, socialism, secularism and nationalism; that is the pillar of subservience to the six mountains, national capitulation and fascist rule and plunder.
At last they formed an open communist party-named bourgeoisie faction.
Thus, they exposed their affiliated sincere revolutionaries before the six mountains’ lackey fascist force and hampered their security. Their those filthy activities have accelerated their doom.
Regarding us, Deben-Bashar say that our politics is correct but we are not linked with the people, we are Trotskyite. By saying so, they proved their ignorance about ABC of Marxism and they are idealist.
Trotskyites can never be correct in politics. Always they will make deviation in politics. So, if we are Trotskyite, then obviously we are not correct in politics. Thus, they themselves are refuting their own positions.
Chairman Mao said, “Where do correct ideas come from? Do they drop from the skies? No. Are they innate in the mind? No. They come from social practice, and from it alone; they come from three kinds of social practice, the struggle for production, the class struggle and scientific experiment.”
It has been expressed through Chairman Mao’s dialectical materialist methodology the mass line, “In all the practical work of our Party, all correct leadership is necessarily “from the masses, to the masses“.
By being linked with the people, we have accumulated experiences of their great practices of production struggle, class struggle and scientific experiment and transformed those into systematized position and activated those (in political, military, organization and other line) by again taking those to the people. In this process, our correct political, military, organizational line developed.
Our politics is correct but we are not linked with that people means our correct political line falls from the sky or innate. It is sheer idealism; the idealist theory that ‘consciousness is inborn, not dependent on matter’ which is against the materialist principle ‘consciousness comes from the matter’.
Their-this position is against dialectical materialism and methodology of mass line.
We established the “East Bengal Workers Movement” to establish a genuine revolutionary political party of proletariat of East Bengal, because the existing communist-named bourgeoisie factions in East Bengal were neither representative of the proletarian class, nor revolutionary. They were various forms of revisionist bourgeoisie factions.
Despite saying us correct, Deben-Bashar didn’t join us unconditionally but made age as an weapon and said that here there was a communist party and they are the representative of that; and that the meaning of denying that is declaring own death warrant.
By that saying, they are opposing the “East Bengal Workers Movement” and the Proletarian Party and demanding leadership through priority of age asking us to accept their leadership.
Thus they prove that they are careerist and greedy for leadership.
It is just their activities, by which they have declared own death warrant. The people and revolutionaries of East Bengal will soon bury them finally. Their-those filthy activities are accelerating their steps towards doom.
The Kazi-Rono-Menon Conspirators
They made personal conflict political, deceived the revolutionaries of the Students Union, formed the Students Union and seized its leadership.
First they joined Huq-Toha and Co., but when leadership and power contradiction arose, they adopted vile conspiracy to seize leadership in various organizations.
They opposed the Great Proletarian and Cultural Revolution by branding it as Chairman Mao’s madness and supported Liu chao Chi.
They opposed the great peasant rebellion of Naxalbari and branded it as CIA activities.
They joined the Motin-Alauddin and Co. and worked with them. Later, for power, they left them and again joined the Huq-Toha and Co.
In the mean time, they seized a part of trade union and students union.
In order to carry their conspiracy more sharply, they formed the Communist Co-ordination Committee.
As politics, they put forward the national oppression over East Bengal as foreign exploitation. Thus, by not specifying enemy, they tried to save the enemies. At last, to pose themselves as Naxalite, they said feudalism versus peasantry contradiction principal and class enemy annihilation.
In this way, they committed similar error like Huq-Toha, Motin-Alauddin. They spread hundreds of slander, bad name and rumor against the East Bengal Workers Movement, even propagated it by branding it as CIA agent.
After 25 March, they went to India, without any self-criticism said national contradiction principal, took shelter of Jyoti Bose-Nambudripod and joined the Co-ordination Committee of the National Liberation Struggle. Thus, they carried similar activates like the Deben-Bashar and co.
They tailed behind the six mountains’ lackeys, threw out own organizational identity, joined the “Liberation Force” and carried the counter-revolutionary war of national subservience. They have admitted in open speech that they didn’t have any guerrilla group of their own.
In some places, they took part with the ‘Liberation Force’ fascists in disarming and killing the cadres of the Proletarian Party of East Bengal.
They welcomed India’s establishing colony in East Bengal and the puppet government of East Bengal as well. They carried open party activities. Consequently, their affiliated genuine revolutionaries got danger.
By the order of the authority of the six mountains’ lackeys, they supported arms surrender. Thus, they disarmed genuine revolutionaries of their organization. They openly opposed China.
At present, they are conspiring to form an open communist-named bourgeoisie faction by following Jyoti Bose-Nambudripod.
They have made malicious propaganda against the Proletarian Party of East Bengal.
Mahbubullah also, at present, is carrying similar activities like the Kazi-Rono and Co.
There is a story of crow and peacock in East Bengal. To pose as peacock, a crow covered its body with the feathers of a peacock. But all those fell down when the peacock poked it and the real black face of the crow got exposed and the crow fled away.
All these bourgeoisie agents of the various forms of revisionist leadership, by covering their body with the feathers of Marxism, try to pose themselves as revolutionary and deceit the proletarian revolutionaries and masses. But their feathers go away in serious revolutionary storm and their real ugly faces of bourgeoisie representative expose.
Huq-Toha-Bashir have upheld themselves as the Liu Chao Chi-Khrushchev of East Bengal.
Deben-Bashar-Kazi-Rono have upheld themselves as the Jyoti Bose-Nambudripod.
Motin-Alauddin have posed themselves as Trotsky-Che.
Chairman Mao said, “Run after falling enemies and finally smash them.” We must run after these falling enemies and finally smash them. We must hold high the banner of “it is right to rebel” and rebel against the capitalist representative various forms of revisionist leadership authorities.
We, the proletarian revolutionaries, let us unite on the basis of Marxism-Leninism-Mao Tse-tung Thought and its concrete application in concrete practice of East Bengal, clear the disunity among the proletarian revolutionaries, and develop the Proletarian party of East Bengal armed with Marxism-Leninism-Mao Tse-tung Thought, well-disciplined, applying the method of criticism-self-criticism, linked with the people, united, strong and single centered.■